According to GameSpot, Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot revealed that intense backlash over the Black samurai protagonist Yasuke directly caused Assassin’s Creed Shadows’ delay from November 15, 2024 to February 14, 2025. During Paris Games Week from October 30 to November 2, Guillemot showed a 184-second corporate video explaining how the company responded to what he called “fake fights” between gameplay and ideology. The video detailed Ubisoft’s strategy to shift focus from critics to allies and emphasize traditional Assassin’s Creed elements like hoods, stealth, and leap of faith moments. Guillemot admitted the company had to prove Shadows was “more of a video game than a message” to combat what he described as aggression from fans. Despite the controversy and delay, the game still reached five million players within five months of its February launch and is now coming to Nintendo Switch 2 in December with preorders live.
Corporate damage control
Here’s the thing about that corporate video Ubisoft produced – it’s fascinating damage control theater. A professionally narrated, 184-second piece that basically admits “we messed up the messaging” while carefully avoiding naming the actual controversy. The narrator asks all these dramatic questions about becoming “the game everyone loves to hate” and ideology overtaking gameplay discussion. But they never actually say “Yasuke” or “Black samurai” or “historical accuracy debates.” It’s corporate speak at its most polished – acknowledging the problem without ever defining it.
And that strategy of leaning hard on franchise staples? “More hood, more stealth, more leap of faith, more lore?” That’s basically Ubisoft admitting they panicked and retreated to safe, familiar territory. When your response to controversy is “let’s remind everyone this is still Assassin’s Creed,” you’re playing defense, not offense.
The real backstory
Let’s be real here – the “ideology” Guillemot keeps referencing is specifically about Yasuke, the Black historical figure who served Oda Nobunaga in 16th century Japan. The backlash was intense and immediate, with critics calling everything from “woke propaganda” to historical inaccuracy. It got so bad that Ubisoft reportedly canceled a Civil War-era Assassin’s Creed game entirely.
But here’s what’s interesting: Guisoft’s response frames this as some abstract debate about “gameplay versus ideology” when everyone knows exactly what sparked the firestorm. They’re treating it like some philosophical discussion rather than specific anger about a Black protagonist in feudal Japan. And Guillemot calling these “fake fights” is… quite a choice. The anger was very real to the people expressing it, even if the historical arguments were questionable.
Delayed but successful
What’s remarkable is that despite all the controversy and the three-month delay, Shadows still hit five million players quickly. The game scored an 8/10 from GameSpot, got its Claws of Awaji expansion, and is now heading to Switch 2. So the delay and rebranding campaign apparently worked.
But it makes you wonder – did Ubisoft overcorrect? By delaying to “prove” this was a real game and not just a message, did they sacrifice some creative ambition to appease critics? The whole situation feels like a case study in how major publishers navigate modern gaming culture wars. They walked this tightrope between standing by their creative choices and desperately trying to win back angry fans.
And honestly, the fact that they felt they needed to produce a whole corporate video explaining their strategy to industry insiders tells you everything about how seriously they took the backlash. Most companies would just quietly delay and move on. Ubisoft made it a whole presentation piece.
