According to CNBC, artificial intelligence companies including Google, Perplexity AI, and OpenAI are offering free services across India through partnerships with telecom providers Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel. Google and Perplexity are providing their services free for 12 to 18 months, while OpenAI has made its ChatGPT Go plan free nationwide for one year. The strategy aims to enlist millions of Indian users to help train AI models for global deployment, leveraging India’s position as one of the world’s fastest-growing digital markets with over 700 million internet users. The country’s AI market is projected to exceed $17 billion by 2027 according to Boston Consulting Group research, with half of India’s internet users already reporting using some form of AI. This approach represents a fundamental shift in how global AI companies view emerging markets.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Unspoken Data Economy
What appears as corporate generosity is actually a sophisticated data acquisition strategy. Unlike traditional markets where users pay for services, Indian consumers are effectively paying with their behavioral data, linguistic patterns, and cultural contexts. This creates a massive training dataset that would cost billions to acquire through conventional means. The diversity of India’s languages, regional expressions, and cultural nuances makes this dataset particularly valuable for creating globally competent AI models. Companies are essentially conducting the world’s largest, most cost-effective AI training exercise, with Indian users as unwitting contributors to their proprietary algorithms.
Winners and Losers in the AI Training Ground
For Indian consumers, particularly the 18-35 demographic highlighted in the report, this represents unprecedented access to cutting-edge technology that might otherwise be financially out of reach. However, the long-term implications are more complex. Indian developers and startups now face competing against globally-scaled AI models trained on their own population’s data. Enterprises benefit from access to sophisticated AI tools, but risk becoming dependent on foreign-controlled technology stacks. The telecom partners—Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel—gain immediate customer engagement benefits, but potentially at the cost of enabling foreign AI dominance in the Indian market.
Data Sovereignty and Digital Colonialism Concerns
The arrangement raises critical questions about data sovereignty that extend beyond typical privacy concerns. When Indian linguistic patterns, cultural contexts, and problem-solving approaches become training data for global AI models, who ultimately owns the resulting intellectual property? This represents a modern form of digital resource extraction, where valuable data assets flow out of the country to enrich foreign corporations. Unlike physical resources, data can be extracted without depletion, but the value accrues primarily to the companies controlling the AI models. This dynamic could create long-term dependencies that undermine India’s ability to develop sovereign AI capabilities.
Global Competitive Landscape Reshaped
The scale of this data acquisition effort could significantly accelerate the development of globally competent AI systems. Models trained on Indian data will inherently understand a broader range of accents, languages, and cultural contexts than those trained primarily on Western data. This gives participating companies a substantial competitive advantage in emerging markets worldwide. Meanwhile, companies not participating in this data gold rush risk falling behind in developing truly global AI capabilities. The strategic implications extend beyond commercial competition to potential geopolitical advantages in AI development and deployment.
The Inevitable Transition and Local Response
When the free periods end in 12-18 months, companies will face the challenge of converting users to paying customers in a market known for price sensitivity. More importantly, this period represents a critical window for Indian policymakers and technology companies to develop responses. We’re likely to see increased focus on data localization requirements, development of homegrown AI alternatives, and potentially new regulatory frameworks governing how foreign companies can use Indian data for model training. The ultimate success of this strategy will depend on whether Indian stakeholders can capture sufficient value from being the world’s AI training ground.
