According to CNBC, Jim Cramer believes Wall Street is overly fixated on the high valuations of tech and speculative stocks, pointing to Tuesday’s market decline where the S&P 500 dropped 1.17%, the Dow fell 0.53%, and the Nasdaq Composite sank 2.04%. Palantir shares fell nearly 8% despite beating earnings estimates and offering solid guidance, with the company citing growth in its artificial intelligence business. Cramer argued money managers immediately think of high-flying speculative stocks when asked if markets are expensive, ignoring the other 334 S&P 500 stocks trading below 23 times earnings. He described Palantir as difficult to classify since it straddles both tech/AI and speculative stock categories while working as a defense contractor and business consultant. Cramer suggested some overvalued stocks can be justified by growth prospects, including what he calls the “Magnificent Seven” and ultimately Palantir itself.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
Cramer’s credibility problem
Here’s the thing about taking Cramer’s market advice seriously – the man has become something of a meme for his famously bad timing. Remember when he told everyone to stay invested right before the 2008 crash? Or his various “buy now” calls that immediately preceded massive drops? It’s not that he’s always wrong, but his track record makes you wonder whether he’s the right messenger for this particular argument. When someone who’s been consistently bullish on speculative tech suddenly says “don’t worry about valuations,” maybe we should worry a little more.
The valuation reality check
So is Cramer right that only a handful of stocks are overvalued? Well, that depends on your definition of “overvalued.” The S&P trading at 23 times earnings might sound reasonable compared to some tech names, but historically that’s actually quite rich. And let’s be honest – when the market leader drops 8% on good news, that’s not just “cooling off.” That’s investors waking up to the fact that even great companies can be terrible investments if you pay too much for them. Palantir’s problem isn’t its business – it’s that its stock price has gotten way ahead of even optimistic growth projections.
What this means for everyone else
Basically, when the speculative darlings sneeze, the whole market catches a cold. Tuesday’s broad selloff shows how interconnected everything has become. The worrying part? This isn’t just about Palantir or AI stocks. It’s about what happens when a handful of companies drive most of the market’s gains. If investors lose faith in those leaders, where does the money go? Cramer’s right that there are cheaper stocks out there, but will anyone want them if the growth story collapses? That’s the real question nobody seems able to answer.
