CoreWeave’s Strategic Stance: Why Core Scientific Acquisition Faces Shareholder Resistance

Deal Dynamics Shift as CoreWeave Takes “Nice to Have” Position

CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator has characterized the company‘s proposed acquisition of Core Scientific as discretionary rather than essential, signaling a potential shift in negotiation strategy as shareholder opposition mounts. The comments, made during a CNBC interview, come at a critical juncture for the $9 billion all-stock deal that would combine the AI cloud provider with the Bitcoin mining and data center operator.

Shareholder Resistance Intensifies

The acquisition faces significant headwinds from multiple fronts. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a influential proxy advisory firm, has recommended that Core Scientific shareholders vote against the transaction. According to ISS analysis, Core Scientific’s continued stock price appreciation following the deal announcement suggests investors believe the company is worth substantially more than CoreWeave’s offer.

Two Seas Capital, a major Core Scientific shareholder, has publicly condemned the proposed acquisition as “underwhelming.” In an October 17 letter to shareholders, the investment firm stated: “We see no reason why Core Scientific shareholders should accept such an underwhelming deal. Based on recent trading data, we see little evidence that they will.” This sentiment reflects growing concern that the offer fails to capture Core Scientific’s true market value.

CoreWeave’s Unwavering Valuation Stance

Despite mounting opposition, CoreWeave maintains that its current offer represents fair value. Intrator expressed disappointment with the ISS recommendation but emphasized that the company will not increase its bid. “We think that the bid that we put out there for Core Scientific is a fair representation of the relative value of the two companies as an all stock deal,” Intrator told CNBC.

The CEO’s comments underscore CoreWeave’s disciplined approach to acquisitions. “Everything has a value, and the number we put out is the value we’re willing to pay for them under all circumstances,” Intrator added, suggesting the company has established clear parameters for the transaction.

Strategic Context and Broader Acquisition Strategy

CoreWeave has been aggressively expanding through acquisitions this year, targeting AI-focused companies including OpenPipe, Weights & Biases, and Monolith. The company, which provides Nvidia-powered computing infrastructure to major hyperscalers like Microsoft, is capitalizing on the artificial intelligence investment boom.

“We’ve been in acquisitive mode as we continue to build and extend the functionality of our company,” Intrator noted, highlighting CoreWeave’s broader strategic objectives. The Core Scientific acquisition would represent another step in this expansion, though Intrator’s characterization of it as “nice to have” suggests the company has alternative paths for growth.

Market Reaction and Future Implications

The market response to the proposed deal has been telling. Core Scientific’s stock price fell nearly 18% immediately after the acquisition announcement in July, reflecting initial investor skepticism. However, the subsequent recovery and continued price appreciation have complicated the narrative, with current trading levels suggesting shareholders expect better terms., as additional insights

With the shareholder vote scheduled for October 30, both companies face significant uncertainty. CoreWeave’s position that the deal is non-essential provides leverage in negotiations, while Core Scientific shareholders appear determined to secure better valuation terms. The outcome will not only determine the fate of this specific transaction but could also set precedents for valuation methodologies in the rapidly evolving AI infrastructure sector.

As the deadline approaches, industry observers are watching closely to see whether either party will adjust their position or if the deal will collapse entirely. The situation represents a fascinating case study in acquisition dynamics during a period of rapid technological transformation and market volatility.

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.