According to Tech Digest, Australia has expanded its world-first social media ban for children under 16 to include Reddit and live-streaming platform Kick, bringing the total number of restricted platforms to nine. The landmark legislation takes effect on December 10 and targets platforms whose “sole or a significant purpose is to enable online social interaction.” Tech companies must take “reasonable steps” to prevent under-16 accounts or face fines up to A$50 million ($32.5 million). Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells stated the ban aims to protect children from “harmful and deceptive design features,” while eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant emphasized delaying access gives children time to grow free from “opaque algorithms and endless scroll.” The ban now includes Facebook, X, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Threads, Reddit, and Kick.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The tricky implementation problem
Here’s the thing – this ban raises some serious practical questions. Companies aren’t being forced to use government ID, but they’re expected to figure out age verification somehow. So what does that mean? Probably facial recognition, parental approval systems, or other verification methods that haven’t even been invented yet. But critics are already raising red flags about data privacy risks and whether age verification software can actually work accurately. I mean, we’ve all seen how flawed these systems can be – either blocking legitimate users or letting through people who shouldn’t be there.
Why some platforms made the cut and others didn’t
What’s really interesting is which platforms escaped the ban. Messaging services like WhatsApp and Discord get a pass, as do gaming platforms like Roblox. The government says they have a “different primary purpose” than social interaction. But let’s be honest – anyone who’s spent time on Discord servers or Roblox knows there’s plenty of social interaction happening there. It seems like the lines are pretty blurry, and the government acknowledges this list is “dynamic” and might change. Basically, they’re making this up as they go along, which is both understandable and concerning.
Australia as the test case
Now the whole world is watching. Australia is essentially running a massive experiment in social media age restriction, and other countries are definitely paying attention. If this works without completely breaking the internet or creating a privacy nightmare, we’ll probably see similar moves elsewhere. But that’s a big “if.” The fines are substantial – A$50 million gets companies’ attention – but enforcement could be messy. And let’s not forget Reddit’s particular challenge: a platform built on anonymity now has to figure out who’s actually behind those usernames.
Where this fits in the bigger picture
This isn’t happening in isolation. We’re seeing a global reckoning with social media’s impact on young people, from mental health concerns to addiction issues. Australia’s approach is particularly aggressive though – instead of just requiring parental consent or limited accounts, they’re going for an outright ban. It’s a bold move that reflects growing frustration with tech companies’ self-regulation. Whether it actually protects kids or just pushes them to find workarounds remains to be seen. But one thing’s clear: the era of anything-goes social media access for children appears to be ending.
