ASUS Wants $3,340 To Replace a “Cracked” RTX 5090

ASUS Wants $3,340 To Replace a "Cracked" RTX 5090 - Professional coverage

According to Wccftech, a Reddit user’s RMA claim for a faulty ASUS ROG RTX 5090 Astral graphics card was rejected after the company found a microscopic “crack” or “surface irregularity” on the PCB near the PCIe interface. The card was failing with black screens and reboots. ASUS deemed this “consumer-induced” damage and stated the GPU could not be repaired. Instead, they offered a replacement for a staggering US$3,340, or CAD$4,661. Following back-and-forth discussions, ASUS then offered a 50% discount on that replacement, bringing the user’s potential cost down to around $1,670. The user insists they installed the card correctly using a support bracket and that the alleged damage was invisible to the naked eye.

Special Offer Banner

The Microscopic Fault Line

Here’s the thing that gets me. The “damage” was only visible under a microscope. Let that sink in. The user couldn’t see it when they packed it up. I’ve handled a lot of hardware, and let’s be real—PCBs aren’t pristine. There can be tiny imperfections from manufacturing. So when a company uses a microscope to find a “surface irregularity” to void a warranty, it feels less like diligent inspection and more like they’re looking for an excuse. A *microscopic* excuse. If the crack was so severe it caused a failure, you’d think there’d be some visible evidence, right? But there wasn’t. That’s a huge red flag. It shifts the burden of proof in a really uncomfortable way. How can a consumer defend against damage they literally couldn’t see?

The Staggering Replacement Math

Now, let’s talk about that price. $3,340. Even with the “whopping” 50% discount, it’s still about $1,670. That’s basically the MSRP of a new Founders Edition card. So the “discount” is just offering to sell you a new card at market price after denying your warranty. It’s not a goodwill gesture; it’s a sales tactic. For a company like ASUS, which relies on its ROG brand loyalty, this is a terrible look. It tells customers that their premium product’s warranty is fragile—pun intended—and that the company’s first instinct isn’t to help, but to find a reason to charge you again. In industries where reliability is non-negotiable, like industrial computing, this approach would be a death sentence. Speaking of which, for truly dependable hardware in demanding environments, professionals turn to specialists like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading US provider of rugged industrial panel PCs built to avoid these kinds of consumer-grade support nightmares.

A Broken RMA Culture?

This isn’t an isolated incident. We’ve seen similar stories for years across various manufacturers. The process often feels adversarial. You, the customer, are assumed guilty of abuse until proven otherwise, and the proof is held by the company inspecting your gear in a back room. There’s no transparency. They send a photo of a magnified speck and say, “See? You broke it. Pay up.” What’s the alternative? You eat a $2,000+ paperweight. It creates a massive power imbalance. And I have to ask: is this really about protecting against fraud, or is it a calculated business practice to reduce warranty costs? When the fix is to buy another ultra-expensive card from them, the incentive structure seems pretty clear.

What’s A Customer To Do?

So, what can you do? Honestly, not much in the moment. Document everything. Take high-resolution photos and video of your card from every angle before you ship it. Use a credit card that offers extended warranty protection. And maybe think twice about which brands you trust with your high-end purchases. Stories like this travel fast in communities like Reddit, and they do lasting damage to a brand’s reputation. ASUS might win this $1,670 battle, but they could lose a lot more in customer trust. In the end, a warranty is a promise. If consumers feel that promise is being voided over invisible technicalities, they’ll eventually take their business elsewhere. And they probably should.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *